top of page
Document details
Usefulness Survey
Organizational resilience: A conceptual integrative framework

Kantur, D and Iseri-Say, A

JOURNAL OF STRATEGY PRACTICE

Open Access

Volume:

18

Issue:

6

Pages

62-773

DOI:

Abstract

Increasingly chaotic business environments of today demand organizations to be more resilient. While the concept of resilience is widely discussed in disaster (e.g., Wildavsky, 1991) and crisis management literatures (e.g., Manyena, 2006), the literature on organizational resilience is developing disjointedly in organizational studies. The literature review suggests that some factors that are suggested in the literature as components of organizational resilience are sources contributing to the emergence of resilience in organizations. This study proposes an integrative framework for organizational resilience and introduces a new outcome concept of organizational evolvability, emphasizing the heightened sensitivity and increased wisdom of the post-event organization. In this model, sources of organizational resilience are categorized as perceptual stance, contextual integrity, strategic capacity and strategic acting, and organizational resilience leads to organizational evolvability as its outcome. The proposed organizational resilience framework attempts to provide a synthesis of the divergent literature on resilience and aims to strengthen organizational resilience research for richer theoretical and empirical progress.





Author Keywords:

resilientorganizational resiliencedynamic environmentadaptive capacityrecoveryrenewalstrategic management

Corresponding Author:

Kantur, Deniz

Author Email:

-

Author Affiliation:

Dogus Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Business Adm, Istanbul, Turkey

Document Information

Source::

ISSN:

Source Type:

Document Type:

Language:

Access Type:

Published:

Publisher:

Indexed:

Indexed In:

Journal

1833-3672

Journal

Article

English

Open Access

Nov 2012

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS, UK.

2024-06-29

Emerging Management Research Relevance and Impact Index (EMARRII)

Usage Metrics
Use by Management Practitioners
1
Actual Use
7
Mentions
Of Interest to Practitioners
652
Views
600
Captures
550
Downloads
Usefulness Survey
How useful is this research?
Not usefulSlightly usefulUsefulVery usefulProfoundly useful
Have you used this study's findings in your management practice?
Did you use it alone or alongside findings from other studies?
How did you use this study's findings in your practice?
About the Usefulness Survey

The usefulness survey allows the collection of usefulness data from management practitioners  simultaneously as they discover, access and read management research on our search platform - the MARRII Discovery. 

​

Please note that the usefulness survey is meant to be completed by management practitioners only. Since MARRII exists to ensure management science is both relevant and useful to management practitioners, our priority is in collecting usefulness data from management practitioners, and as such, survey responses from management scholars/academics are neither permitted nor considered as there already is a proliferation of citation-based platforms that provide citation information depicting the usefulness of management research to management scholars/academics.

​

Therefore, only survey responses from verified management practitioner accounts here on MARRII, will be taken into consideration for each research document.

Please note that responses from the usefulness survey is just one component in our suite of actual usage metrics.
 

© 2024 by MARRII. A Stratworth Group Company.

bottom of page